<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>InFusion - Latest Comments</title><link>http://infusioncomms.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://infusioncomms.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:02:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why devaluing the written word poses a serious threat to business</title><link>http://infusioncomms.co.uk/why-be-a-writer-anymore/#comment-2093393214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Though digital publishing and the ability to post anything has its pluses, it has brought all the downsides you've described. I completely agree with you; I only wish I had a crystal ball to see the fallout the ocean of content will eventually create. Anyone can be an author, which affects the demand vs. supply equation: the flood devalues what was held aloft as something rare and rather special.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then again, niche content/genres are finally accessing their readerships, with no gatekeepers controlling what we all read and digest. For the consumer, these changes are wonderful, which is probably why us creators receive little sympathy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hear ya', friend.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diane Hall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Piegonholing writers is shortsighted</title><link>http://infusioncomms.co.uk/why-piegonholing-writers-is-shortsighted/#comment-1484236091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't share y brews :) but i'll certainly share this. Great topic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Writemums Jo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:15:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>